The Godfather Part III
Summary
The first twoGodfathermovies have gain their place among the greatest films ever made , and sadly , The Godfather Part IIIcould not inhabit up to their bequest . After making movie history whenThe GodfatherandThe Godfather Part IIboth bring home the bacon Academy Awards for Best Picture , when the franchise return after 16 old age in 1990 , it did not stack up against the reputation of its predecessor . With tangled plotlines , miscast characters , and a rushed playscript , The Godfather Part IIIhad many issues that meant it was forever doomed to be considered the faint entry in the serial .
Although Francis Ford Coppola’srecut reading titledThe Godfather Coda : The Death of MichaelCorleonewent a prospicient mode toward correcting some of the theatrical edition ’s shift , this was not enough to recontextualize it as equal in calibre to the early movies . The Godfather Part IIIhad raft of issues , and even though there were many interesting concepts and engaging aspect to it , it could not live up to its majestic legacy . The Godfather Part IIIreceived some unjust criticism , but looking back on it today , it ’s clean many of the complaints aimed at it were justified .
10The Godfather 3’s Story Felt Like An Epilogue, Not A Full Movie
The Godfather 3 was more of a postscript
When comparingThe Godfather Part IIIto its predecessors , one of the most striking issuance was that it felt more like an epilogue to the floor than a fully - fledged feature film . Unlike the previous entries ' one and only geographic expedition of power , perfidy , and family dynamics , the thirdGodfatherwas more interested in tying up escaped ends and reflecting on past issue . This meant that althoughPart IIIhad plenty of impactful moments , it could never live up to the stupefying achievements of the first two films .
The Godfather Part IIIended the saga of the Corleone family , and evenFrancis Ford Coppola repeatedly referred to it as an epilogue or coda . With this in mind , theGodfatherseries became a far more gratifying experience if the first two movies were viewed as a duology andPart IIIas an epilogue . RepositioningThe Godfather Part IIIwithin this context of use allowed for its more compelling face to be treasure without harshly comparing it to the first two movies , which have long been in the running for status as among the groovy motion picture ever made .
9Sofia Coppola Was Miscast As Mary Corleone
The Godfather 3 almost had a different actress play Mary
One of the big complaints posed at the lustreless response toThe Godfather Part IIIwas that Sofia Coppola was woefully miscast as Mary Corleone , the girl of Michael Corleone and Kay Adams . As managing director Francis Ford Coppola ’s daughter , Sofia ’s performance was critically pan , leading to some flavor she was only rove due to nepotism . Disappointingly , Coppola did not have the acting chops needed to pull off such a vital character , and her unsuitability for the part was apparent throughout the film .
To make matters worse , Coppola act as a last - minute replacement for Winona Ryder , who had to begin with been cast as Mary . While viewing audience will never know if Ryder could have done a better job , based on her antecedently hail carrying into action and role , an alternative creation with Ryder in that part feel far more appropriate . Ryder ’s absence seizure doomedThe Godfather Part IIIand was just one of many compounding aspects that meant the film did not live up to the reputation of the old two moving-picture show .
8The Godfather 3 Needed Robert Duvall’s Tom Hagen
The Godfather 3 almost had a different plotline
The character of Tom Hagen was one of the most important in the first twoGodfathermovies , and many viewing audience felt he should have been the one to take over after the death of Vito Corleone . Once Michael became the capitulum of the sept , all hell break liberal , which led to the murder of Fredo and mount tensions within the Italian mafia . As a viewer , it feel like thing could have been much different with Hagen at the helm , and this fight could have acted as a great plot line forThe Godfather Part III .
This was actually the plan originally , but Hagen ’s player Robert Duvall abut head with the studio apartment over money takings . Although Duvall was reportedly put up $ 1 million to appear inThe Godfather Part III , he took result with Al Pacino ’s $ 8 million payday , which mean negotiations give way down , and he was write out of the story . Sadly , Duvall ’s absence seizure was painfully sense , and those who have intercourse revise film chronicle have long extolled thata confrontation between Michael Corleone and Tom Hagen would have helped elevatePart IIIto the level of its two predecessor .
Robert Duvall ’s Tom Hagen is an integral part of the first two Godfather films , but his absence in the third installment is a disappointment for audiences .
7The Godfather 3 Does Not Work As A Stand Alone Story
The Godfather 3 was reliant on the legacy of the previous films
One of the great ground that the first twoGodfathermovies earn such an acclaimed place in moving picture history was that , although they worked so well together , they were also splendid movies on their own merits . A major job withThe Godfather Part IIIwas that it did not work well as a support - alone story . While viewers could jump-start in onPart IIand still become endue in the struggles of Michael Corleone and the flashbacks to his father ’s wage hike in organise criminal offence , without noesis of these characters ' arcs , The Godfather Part IIIdoes not make any sense .
The originalGodfatherwas an incredible crime tale , the likes of which cinema had never previously go through , andPart IIcan be seen as a dual tale that narrate the opponent and interconnected story of a begetter and son . However , The Godfather Part IIIneeds so much prior context that it becomes less like an autonomous movie and more like an extended ADHD - onto what add up before . Audiences should not be leave scratching their fountainhead or wish they had watch out a recap of another movie , and for this reason , Part IIIpaled in equivalence to the previous films .
6Coppola Was No Longer At The Top Of His Game
The Godfather 3 was produced long after Coppola’s heyday
When Francis Ford Coppola made the first two flick inThe Godfatherseries , he was at the downright top of his secret plan as a filmmaker . Coppola was producing work with a level of artistry equal to the salutary filmmakers who ever lived , and this unbelievable confidence poured intoevery shot inThe GodfatherandPart II . Sadly , this was not the pillow slip forPart III , asCoppola was only convinced to make it in the first place because he had just suffer several box office bombsand needed something to set up his standing in Hollywood .
While the previous movies sense like stories that Coppola absolutely need to tell on covert , his ticker was n’t in it forThe Godfather Part III . Coppola believed that the first two films in the serial had completed the story , but Paramount Pictures spent year trying to win over him to issue forth back for another picnic . While the first twoGodfatherswere produced out of a sentiency of artistic passion and creative energy , the circumstances under whichThe Godfather Part IIIwas released were primarily financial .
5Mary Corleone’s Romance Subplot Was Uncomfortable
The Godfather 3 had an unnecessary incestuous romance
depend back onThe Godfather Part III , one subplot made for frankly uncomfortable viewing . Sofia Coppola ’s portrayal of Mary Corleone got plenty of criticism , but the even worse part was her incestuous romance with her first cousin Vincent Corleone . While there were allusion to the couple ’s romance being forbidden , looking back onThe Godfather Part III , these were brush over as mildly taboo instead of a really shocking overstepping of boundary .
AsThe Godfather Part IIIbuilt toward its grand conclusion , the incestuous romance between Mary and Vincent appeared to be present as a deplorable eccentric of star - crossed lover . However , as a watcher , this plotline felt miscalculated on every spirit level , as it was unimaginable to get fully invested in the tragedy of its end because of just how much it pushed against the ethics of inherited relationships . WhileThe Godfather Part IIIhas been below the belt pronounce over the old age , few would deny that this plotline was incredibly creepy-crawly .
4The Godfather 3 Script Was Rushed
The Godfather 3 was written in just six weeks
While so many criticisms ofThe Godfather Part IIIrelate to its casting decisions , the movie itself had a clearness issuing make by its hurry script . AlthoughFrancis Ford Coppola and Mario Puzo quest six months to get their screenplay quick , Paramount shockingly contribute them just six weeks ( viaCollider . ) With an obligation to rush out a script that needed extra time , care , and attention , it ’s no surprise that aspects ofThe Godfather Part IIIfelt twist around and dissatisfying .
A major reasonThe Godfather Part IIIdidn’t hold out up to the other movies was that it was written with a high-pitched - pressure deadline looming in the background knowledge . unhappily , Coppola no longer had the clout need to take the exemption he and Puzo required to craft a book that was suitable of living up to two of the greatest films ever written . Unsurprisingly , The Godfather Part IIIdidn’t populate up to its predecessor ’s legacy , as its script was never give the luck to improve over further redraft and rewrites .
3The Absence Of Vito Corleone
The Godfather 3 lacked the one of its most important characters
The persona discharge of Vito and Michael Corleone were the drive force behind much of the achiever of the first twoGodfathermovies . As a forefather - Logos story narrate over several decades , part of the appeal ofThe Godfatherwas follow Vito Corleone ’s emanation in the reprehensible Hades and seeing how that affected the next generation of his menage . The first twoGodfathermovies were just as much about Vito as they were about Michael , and two vocation - defining performances from Marlon Brando and Robert DeNiro serve make him one of cinema ’s most enduring characters .
Although Vito ’s memory loomed heavily overThe Godfather Part III , the fact that his eccentric was not include meant that the third entry paled in comparison to the premature two . The double narrative ofPart IIhelped give spare resonance to the failures of Michaelas the raw leader of the Corleone family , and this sentience of thematic deepness felt like it was miss fromPart III . It make water gumption that Francis Ford Coppola consideredPart IIImore of an epilogue than a true third installment , as its second protagonist was miss from the story .
2Al Pacino’s Acting Style Had Changed A Lot Since The 1970s
The Godfather 3 featured a much different Pacino
From his work alone in the 1970s , Al Pacino garner his reputation as amongthe greatest actors ever . With staggering performances in motion-picture show likeSerpicoandDog Day Afternoon , Pacino prepare a raw monetary standard for performers and , along with role player like Robert De Niro and Jack Nicholson , became poster boys for the New Hollywood geological era of filmmaking . While Pacino ’s work proceed up a high touchstone in later eld , by the time it got to the 1990s , his vogue had become far more abrasive and lacked the subtle nuances of Michael Corleone in the first twoGodfathermovies .
This change in style was obtrusive inThe Godfather Part III , and rather than truly personify Michael ’s character , there was a sense that audiences were witness Pacino imitating Michael . It had been 16 years since Pacino had played the character , and this point of distance had an encroachment . While that ’s not to say that Pacino did a big job as Michael inPart III , there was just something slightly off that meant it could not live up to the previous two movies .
1The Godfather 3 Plotlines Were Overstuffed And Convoluted
The Godfather 3 should have been more streamlined
While the first twoGodfathermovies have experience universal praise for their unbelievable pacing and masterfully balanced story arcs , the hard truth was thatThe Godfather Part IIIhad overstuffed and convoluted plotlines . A major fault was that the bluff magnitude of subplots and intricate characters ' relationship inPart IIIseemed to function little purpose . The Godfather Part IIIattempted to tackle too many radical at once and , in the process , got bogged down under the weight of its own order of magnitude .
There was Michael Corleone ’s pursuit for redemption , his corrupt dealings with the Vatican , his girl ’s incestuous relationship , and a litany of other dislocated storylines . The Godfather Part IIIalso introduce unexampled primary characters , such as Vincent and Mary Corleone , whose motivations and arcs felt underdeveloped and , quite frankly , rushed . deplorably , The Godfather Part IIIwas a lesson in wasted opportunities , and if its tale had been streamlined and simplified a little scrap more , it could have potentially pile up against its forerunner .
Source : Collider
Custom image by Yailin Chacon.
Your Rating
Your commentary has not been saved
Cast
The Godfather Part III is the third and final film in Francis Ford Coppola ’s Godfather trilogy . The film again focalize on Michael Corleone , who is now in his 60s and look for his replacement as the brain of the kinfolk business . While still stupefy favourable reviews upon release , the motion picture is often considered a important drop in timber compared to its predecessor .
Custom image by Yeider Chacon
Custom image by Yeider Chacon
